Saturday, January 21, 2012

Russian Revolution in the Eastern Europe

The Russian revolution in the Eastern Europe is a mirror of the Arab Spring, which represented the revolutionary wave of demonstrations occurred in the Arab World in 2010-2011.

The Arab chain of revolutions ended with the US' temporary agreement with Russia to move the American missile shield from Poland to these (mostly) North African states, further from Russia's borders.

After Russia resolved the problem of Ukraine, ousting Yushchenko, now Romania, Hungary and Slovakia are scheduled to turn left.

Poland is still a battlefield and a big question mark. We'll see if Russia succeeds to take Poland as well, like it plans to take Romania, Hungary and Slovakia.
Conclusion:
Russia fights to push away the US' missile shield, at the same time trying to fortify its borders.

Below is a map with the revolutionary events that took place
since 2010, up to the current day:

MAP LEGEND:

BLUE: Resolved by Russia a while aback
RED: Taken by the US
YELLOW: Russian Revolution unfolding

DOTTED RED: Case unresolved by US
DOTTED YELLOW: Case unresolved by Russia
EASTERN EUROPE
RUSSIAN-BACKED REVOLUTIONS:

1. HUNGARY:

Hungarians protest en masse against new constitution

(AFP) – Jan 2, 2012

Protesters denounced the government of Viktor Orban, with the socialist MSZP, the green-leftist LMP and former prime minister Ferenc Gyurcsany's DK taking part in the rally. Politicians were not allowed to take the stage.

2. SLOVAKIA:

Updated 10:32 p.m., Thursday, January 19, 2012

In Slovakia, meanwhile, opinion polls predict a probable return to power in March elections for Robert Fico, a former left-wing prime minister who has also worried Western diplomats with a sympathetic approach toward authoritarian states. Fico took Russia's side during its 2008 war with Georgia — bucking a trend across the former Soviet bloc to express concern over Moscow's use of power. He has also celebrated Fidel Castro's Cuban revolution.

3. ROMANIA:

4:18 p.m. CST, January 19, 2012

About 7,000 opposition supporters rallied in Bucharest earlier on Thursday to demand the government's resignation

The rally was organized by the leftist opposition USL to press for the resignation of Prime Minister Emil Boc's centrist coalition and his ally President Traian Basescu.

4. POLAND - STILL A BATTLEFIELD:

In striking contrast to trouble in much of the region, there is one relative oasis: Poland, the largest of the 10 ex-communist states that joined the EU in recent years. Its economy has seen unusual dynamism given the difficult times, thanks in some part to massive infrastructure projects in recent years as Poland prepares to co-host this summer's European football championships with Ukraine.

But economists fear that its economy, too, could lose momentum after the Euro 2012 and with far-ranging austerity measures set to start taking effect this year in an effort to keep state debt from spiraling out of control.

The 2012 UEFA European Football Championship is commonly referred to as Euro 2012.
The final tournament will be hosted by Poland and Ukraine between 8 June and 1 July 2012.

U.S.-Poland Missile Plan Enters into Force

By Merle David Kellerhals Jr. Staff Writer 15 September 2011

By 2015, land-based SM-3 interceptors will begin being deployed in Romania and then in Poland by 2018, according to the White House.

U.S. Likely to Press On With Missile Defense in Poland

January 12, 2012, 1:16 PM CET

Russia says missile defense deal with US still possible, but time running out

By Associated Press, Published: January 18

MOSCOW — A deal with Washington to assuage Moscow’s concerns about U.S. missile defense plans in Europe is still possible, but time is running out, Russia’s foreign minister said Wednesday.

Sergey Lavrov reaffirmed that Moscow will take retaliatory action if moves by Washington to deploy missile shield components around Europe pose a threat to Russia.

5. BULGARIA:

Bulgaria Won't Host US, NATO Missile Shield Facilities - Defense Min

Defense May 5, 2011, Thursday

Bulgaria will not be hosting elements of the US and NATO missile defense system in Europe, at least for the time being, Defense Minister Anyu Angelov announced.

 
NORTH AFRICAN US-BACKED REVOLUTIONS:

1. US' MISSILE SHIELD MOVED FROM POLAND TO THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA:
US launches new missile defense program for Europe

Wednesday, 02 March 2011

The United States is sending a special radar-equipped warship to the Mediterranean Sea next week, the first step in the development of a broad anti-ballistic missile system to protect Europe against a potential Iranian nuclear threat, the Pentagon said Tuesday.

The move marks the first of the Obama administration's four-phase plan to put land- and sea-based radars and interceptors in several European locations during the next decade.

Under the plan laid out by the Obama administration in 2009, the missile shield would begin with ship-based anti-missile interceptors and radars. Later this year, the United States plans to add land-based radars in southern Europe. Plumb said officials are still in discussions with several nations, but the exact location for those radars had not yet been determined.

In phase two, land-based interceptors would be deployed in Romania in 2015, followed by the placement of interceptors in Poland in 2018.

The Bush administration first proposed stationing 10 interceptor missiles in Poland and an advanced radar in the Czech Republic. But Russia angrily objected and warned that it would station its own missiles close to Poland if the plan went through.

In September 2009, the Obama administration shelved that plan and offered the new, reconfigured phased program.

2. THE ARAB SPRING:

The Arab Spring (Arabic: الربيع العربي ar-Rabīʻ al-ʻArabiyy), otherwise known as the Arab Awakening,[1] is a revolutionary wave of demonstrations and protests occurring in the Arab world that began on Saturday, 18 December 2010.
To date, there have been revolutions in TunisiaHYPERLINK \l "cite_note-tropicpost-1"[2] and Egypt;[3] a civil war in Libya resulting in the fall of its government;[4] civil uprisings in Bahrain,[5] Syria,[6] and Yemen, the latter resulting in the resignation of the Yemeni prime minister;[7] major protests in Algeria,[8] Iraq,[9] Jordan,[10] Kuwait,[11] Morocco,[12] and Oman;[13] and minor protests in Lebanon,[14] Mauritania, Saudi Arabia,[15] Sudan,[16] and Western Sahara.[

3. SPAIN:

Russia criticizes latest U.S. missile defense deal

MOSCOW Thu Oct 6, 2011 5:59am EDT

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia said on Thursday moves by the United States to create a NATO-wide missile shield could undermine its security, ramping up criticism of the project following a new deal that will see U.S. anti-missile warships deployed on the Spanish coast.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/06/us-russia-usa-missiles-idUSTRE7951R620111006
4. TURKEY:

US military early warning radar station goes online in Turkey despite opposition
January 18, 2012

==========================================

FULL-LENGTH ARTICLES:

Romanian riots reveal growing gloom in region

 
ALISON MUTLER, Associated Press, VANESSA GERA, Associated Press
Updated 10:32 p.m., Thursday, January 19, 2012

BUCHAREST, Romania (AP) — Romanian cities are gripped by the worst street violence in over a decade. Slovaks seem poised to re-elect a confrontational and divisive populist. Hungary alarms the European Union with laws that erode democratic rights.

In former Soviet bloc nations now part of the EU, frustration is mounting due to economic stagnation and worrisome governance, encouraging street protests and unpredictability that could further jeopardize growth and stability in an already troubled part of the continent.

Many of the problems are common far beyond the region: indebted states hiking taxes and slashing state spending to stay solvent. But the added burdens come to a region that was already grappling with much deeper poverty and corruption than in the West before the global financial crisis hit.

In recent days, the situation has played out most dramatically in Romania, where pent-up fury with the government and an eroding standard of living exploded into days of street protests that at times turned violent. In Bucharest over the weekend, 59 people were injured in fighting that saw riot police turn tear gas on protesters who attacked them with stones and firebombs.

"What happened last weekend is only the beginning," commentator Gabriel Bejan wrote in Tuesday's Romania Libera daily paper. "We are in an important electoral year and such confrontations will be frequent. What will they lead to when nobody seems willing to take a step back?"

Much of the frustration goes back to the way Romania transitioned to democracy after its 1989 coup against dictator Nicolae Ceausescu — with many former communists keeping control of power and resources. The results, today, are seen in entrenched cronyism, a huge gap between rich and poor and a lack of government transparency that feeds a widespread sense of injustice.

"The Mafioso government stole everything we had!" protesters declared on banners at several of the rallies that have taken place in more than a dozen Romanian cities since Thursday and appear set to go on.

Hungarians have also been taking to the streets with increased frequency in recent months over a new constitution and a blizzard of new laws that concentrate power for the right-wing Fidesz party of Prime Minister Viktor Orban.

Freedom House, a U.S. group that carries out a yearly global survey of political freedom and civil liberties, has observed "hints of re-emergent illiberalism" across central Europe, said Christopher Walker, the group's vice president for strategy and analysis.

This year's report, which was published Thursday, highlights what it sees as a deteriorating climate for civil liberties in Hungary due to threats to the independence of the press and the judiciary.

"Hungary has shown a bent towards illiberalism which is really inconsistent with the European idea," Walker said.

The EU agrees. On Tuesday the EU Commission launched legal challenges against Budapest over its new constitution and other laws which took effect Jan. 1, saying they undermine the independence of the national central bank and the judiciary and do not respect data privacy principles.

Orban's tightening hold on many institutions comes thanks to an overwhelming 2010 victory for his party on the heels of near economic collapse by the previous, Socialist-led government.

But the mounting EU pressure appeared to have some effect: EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said Wednesday that he received a letter from Orban promising to modify the legislation that raised EU concerns.

In Slovakia, meanwhile, opinion polls predict a probable return to power in March elections for Robert Fico, a former left-wing prime minister who has also worried Western diplomats with a sympathetic approach toward authoritarian states. Fico took Russia's side during its 2008 war with Georgia — bucking a trend across the former Soviet bloc to express concern over Moscow's use of power. He has also celebrated Fidel Castro's Cuban revolution.

In striking contrast to trouble in much of the region, there is one relative oasis: Poland, the largest of the 10 ex-communist states that joined the EU in recent years. Its economy has seen unusual dynamism given the difficult times, thanks in some part to massive infrastructure projects in recent years as Poland prepares to co-host this summer's European football championships with Ukraine.

But economists fear that its economy, too, could lose momentum after the Euro 2012 and with far-ranging austerity measures set to start taking effect this year in an effort to keep state debt from spiraling out of control.

But for now, anger is clearly greater in Hungary and Romania, and in both places the unfolding developments are shaped greatly by the legacy of communist rule.

In Hungary, Orban has justified his upending of the country's laws by arguing that the former communists and their way of thinking were never purged entirely from democratic Hungary.
Romania sees many of its problems exacerbated by the continued rule of some former communists, including President Traian Basescu, 60, who under Ceausescu was a ship captain for the state shipping company Navrom in Antwerp. That was a position of privilege which allowed him to earn coveted hard currency.

Feeding frustration is a sense that there is too little transparency over the doings, past and present, of Romania's leaders.

More than two decades after the overthrow of Ceausescu, authorities have opened only a handful of the files of the former dreaded Securitate secret police, which had 760,000 informers in a nation of 22 million. Former agents are believed to be active in politics, business and the media — though the public has never been given the full picture.

Also, only a handful of senior officials were ever tried for the mass shootings of unarmed civilians in the 1989 revolution, perpetuating a sense that that story, too, is being covered up.

A political analyst who has studied the revolutions of Eastern Europe, Christopher Chivvis with the RAND Corporation, sees many of today's injustices as being rooted in the overly rapid move toward a market economy in the 1990s.

When state-run industries were privatized then, it was generally only the former communist apparatchiks who knew how to maneuver the system to take hold of them and run them.
"Those who had the know-how — the former regime officials — were able to snatch up large amounts of former state property in ways that ultimately entrenched their position in society and in the state," said Chivvis, who is also a professor in European studies at Johns Hopkins University.

Many Romanians express deep frustration over this.

"We still have unanswered questions regarding shady privatization deals made in the 90s," said Cristina, a Romanian woman who asked that her last name not be published because she works for the government and fears retribution.

Romania’s protests reveal mounting frustration over poverty, injustice in eastern Europe

By Associated Press, Published: January 19

BUCHAREST, Romania — Romanian cities are gripped by the worst street violence in over a decade. Slovaks seem poised to re-elect a confrontational and divisive populist. Hungary alarms the European Union with laws that erode democratic rights.

In former Soviet bloc nations now part of the EU, frustration is mounting due to economic stagnation and worrisome governance, encouraging street protests and unpredictability that could further jeopardize growth and stability in an already troubled part of the continent.

Many of the problems are common far beyond the region: indebted states hiking taxes and slashing state spending to stay solvent. But the added burdens come to a region that was already grappling with much deeper poverty and corruption than in the West before the global financial crisis hit.

In recent days, the situation has played out most dramatically in Romania, where pent-up fury with the government and an eroding standard of living exploded into days of street protests that at times turned violent. In Bucharest over the weekend, 59 people were injured in fighting that saw riot police turn tear gas on protesters who attacked them with stones and firebombs.

"What happened last weekend is only the beginning," commentator Gabriel Bejan wrote in Tuesday’s Romania Libera daily paper. "We are in an important electoral year and such confrontations will be frequent. What will they lead to when nobody seems willing to take a step back?"

Much of the frustration goes back to the way Romania transitioned to democracy after its 1989 coup against dictator Nicolae Ceausescu — with many former communists keeping control of power and resources.
The results, today, are seen in entrenched cronyism, a huge gap between rich and poor and a lack of government transparency that feeds a widespread sense of injustice.
"The Mafioso government stole everything we had!" protesters declared on banners at several of the rallies that have taken place in more than a dozen Romanian cities since Thursday and appear set to go on.

Hungarians have also been taking to the streets with increased frequency in recent months over a new constitution and a blizzard of new laws that concentrate power for the right-wing Fidesz party of Prime Minister Viktor Orban.

Freedom House, a U.S. group that carries out a yearly global survey of political freedom and civil liberties, has observed "hints of re-emergent illiberalism" across central Europe, said Christopher Walker, the group’s vice president for strategy and analysis.

This year’s report, which was published Thursday, highlights what it sees as a deteriorating climate for civil liberties in Hungary due to threats to the independence of the press and the judiciary.

"Hungary has shown a bent towards illiberalism which is really inconsistent with the European idea," Walker said.

The EU agrees. On Tuesday the EU Commission launched legal challenges against Budapest over its new constitution and other laws which took effect Jan. 1, saying they undermine the independence of the national central bank and the judiciary and do not respect data privacy principles.

Orban’s tightening hold on many institutions comes thanks to an overwhelming 2010 victory for his party on the heels of near economic collapse by the previous, Socialist-led government.
But the mounting EU pressure appeared to have some effect: EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said Wednesday that he received a letter from Orban promising to modify the legislation that raised EU concerns.

In Slovakia, meanwhile, opinion polls predict a probable return to power in March elections for Robert Fico, a former left-wing prime minister who has also worried Western diplomats with a sympathetic approach toward authoritarian states. Fico took Russia’s side during its 2008 war with Georgia — bucking a trend across the former Soviet bloc to express concern over Moscow’s use of power. He has also celebrated Fidel Castro’s Cuban revolution.

In striking contrast to trouble in much of the region, there is one relative oasis: Poland, the largest of the 10 ex-communist states that joined the EU in recent years. Its economy has seen unusual dynamism given the difficult times, thanks in some part to massive infrastructure projects in recent years as Poland prepares to co-host this summer’s European football championships with Ukraine.

But economists fear that its economy, too, could lose momentum after the Euro 2012 and with far-ranging austerity measures set to start taking effect this year in an effort to keep state debt from spiraling out of control.

But for now, anger is clearly greater in Hungary and Romania, and in both places the unfolding developments are shaped greatly by the legacy of communist rule.

In Hungary, Orban has justified his upending of the country’s laws by arguing that the former communists and their way of thinking were never purged entirely from democratic Hungary.

Romania sees many of its problems exacerbated by the continued rule of some former communists, including President Traian Basescu, 60, who under Ceausescu was a ship captain for the state shipping company Navrom in Antwerp. That was a position of privilege which allowed him to earn coveted hard currency.

Feeding frustration is a sense that there is too little transparency over the doings, past and present, of Romania’s leaders.

More than two decades after the overthrow of Ceausescu, authorities have opened only a handful of the files of the former dreaded Securitate secret police, which had 760,000 informers in a nation of 22 million. Former agents are believed to be active in politics, business and the media — though the public has never been given the full picture.

Also, only a handful of senior officials were ever tried for the mass shootings of unarmed civilians in the 1989 revolution, perpetuating a sense that that story, too, is being covered up.
A political analyst who has studied the revolutions of Eastern Europe, Christopher Chivvis with the RAND Corporation, sees many of today’s injustices as being rooted in the overly rapid move toward a market economy in the 1990s.

When state-run industries were privatized then, it was generally only the former communist apparatchiks who knew how to maneuver the system to take hold of them and run them.
"Those who had the know-how — the former regime officials — were able to snatch up large amounts of former state property in ways that ultimately entrenched their position in society and in the state," said Chivvis, who is also a professor in European studies at Johns Hopkins University.

Many Romanians express deep frustration over this.

"We still have unanswered questions regarding shady privatization deals made in the 90s," said Cristina, a Romanian woman who asked that her last name not be published because she works for the government and fears retribution.

Vanessa Gera reported from Warsaw, Poland. Associated Press writer Karel Janicek contributed from Prague.

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

U.S. Likely to Press On With Missile Defense in Poland

By Marcin Sobczyk

January 12, 2012, 1:16 PM CET

The U.S. will likely keep its commitment to place missile interceptors in Poland to counter a military threat from Iran regardless of any opposition from Russia and despite defense cutbacks, a U.S. senator said Thursday.

U.S. President Barack Obama in 2009 scrapped the missile-defense plan drafted by his predecessor, George W. Bush, under which Poland would host a base near its border with the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad. The U.S. later proposed a new system envisaging 24 interceptors in Poland at the same location.

"Indications are that despite defense cutbacks, we’re going to maintain the commitment to build the Polish missile-defense system, and that is because the threat from Iran is growing, it’s clear that Iran’s nuclear programs are accelerating," Illinois Republican Senator Mark Kirk told reporters in Warsaw.

"My hope is that we stay on schedule for a 2018 full operational capability of 24 interceptors at Redzikowo to defend NATO and the United States," he added. "The Russians have been pretty hostile to missile defense. They say that in some way this threatens their nuclear deterrents, but we’re going to build only 24 interceptors in Poland and last I checked Russia has more than 24 nuclear weapons. … We need to defend a free, sovereign and independent Poland regardless of what Russia thinks."

Abandoning the missile-shield project in 2009 had irked Polish officials, who saw the move as part of Mr. Obama’s effort to improve relations with Russia while ignoring Poland’s strategic defense choices.

Poland was forced into the Soviet bloc after World War II and joined NATO in 1999, 10 years after the collapse of communism. Its relationship with Russia remains marred by historical disagreements.

The revival of the Polish missile-defense site plan provoked a Russian response last year, including from President Dmitry Medvedev, who in November 2011 threatened to deploy ballistic missiles to Kaliningrad if the U.S. proceeded with its plan.

Russia negotiated with the U.S. to be given access to data and operations of the U.S.-led missile-defense system as a condition for its acceptance of the project. The U.S. Congress passed restrictions on such data sharing, Senator Kirk said Thursday.

"I’ve expressed some concerns here about having Russians enter the NATO defense system. I think that’s a mistake. The Congress has passed restrictions, saying that no classified data, hit-to-kill technology, or telemetry can be given to the Russians, as well as any other data, and if there’s a proposal to give it to the Russians, that a 60-day delay be imposed," he said.

Russia has a close relationship with Iran and its president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and shares information it gets from NATO, he added.

"Dmitry Rogozin, who’s the deputy prime minister of Russia in charge of these affairs, is scheduled to go to Iran. My worry is that anything we give to him is immediately given to the Ahmadinejad government—and the whole point of the Polish missile-defense system is to defend against Iran," the senator said.

"We should not let the Russians accomplish by diplomacy what they can’t accomplish by espionage, especially given the Russian relationship with the Iranians. I believe everything that we give to the Russians immediately goes to the Iranians," he added.

He also said Russia’s perception of a military threat from Iran is "probably too low," and that if Iran manufactures a nuclear bomb, it will be able to share it with others in the Middle East, which will make nuclear weapons harder to control. This could backfire for Russia if a party hostile to Moscow, such as Chechen separatists, obtains access to the weapons, he added.

"You could see a scenario when Chechens might get access to a weapon. At that point, a weapon could be used just as well against Russians as against NATO. I think the Russians inaccurately perceive the danger," Mr. Kirk said.

US launches new missile defense program for Europe
(moving the missile shield from Poland to the Mediterranean Sea)

Wednesday, 02 March 2011

The United States is sending a special radar-equipped warship to the Mediterranean Sea next week, the first step in the development of a broad anti-ballistic missile system to protect Europe against a potential Iranian nuclear threat, the Pentagon said Tuesday.

The move marks the first of the Obama administration's four-phase plan to put land- and sea-based radars and interceptors in several European locations during the next decade.
Endorsed by NATO during a summit in Lisbon last year, the missile shield has triggered opposition from Russia and set off lengthy negotiations over the future expanded ability to shoot down ballistic missiles in the region.

John F. Plumb, principal director for Pentagon nuclear and missile defense policy, said Tuesday that the USS Monterey will leave Norfolk, Virginia, next week, heading to a six-month deployment in the Mediterranean. The ship's mission, he said, will lay groundwork for the unfolding missile defense plan there.

"Here is our first concrete demonstration of our commitment to the missile defense of our deployed forces, allies and partners in Europe," Plumb said in an interview. "We said we were going to do it, and now we're doing it."

Under the plan laid out by the Obama administration in 2009, the missile shield would begin with ship-based anti-missile interceptors and radars. Later this year, the United States plans to add land-based radars in southern Europe. Plumb said officials are still in discussions with several nations, but the exact location for those radars had not yet been determined.

In phase two, land-based interceptors would be deployed in Romania in 2015, followed by the placement of interceptors in Poland in 2018. Each phase calls for a more sophisticated and capable interceptor, culminating at the end of the decade with the deployment of the last version planned as of now.

The goal is to protect NATO nations against medium-range missile attacks, with the focus being the growing nuclear threat from Iran.

The USS Monterey is a guided missile cruiser equipped with a sophisticated Aegis radar system. Other ballistic missile defense capable ships have been deployed by the U.S. Navy to the Mediterranean since 2009, but this is the first to go under the new European defense plan.

The Bush administration first proposed stationing 10 interceptor missiles in Poland and an advanced radar in the Czech Republic. But Russia angrily objected and warned that it would station its own missiles close to Poland if the plan went through.

In September 2009, the Obama administration shelved that plan and offered the new, reconfigured phased program.

Since then, U.S. and Russian officials have been struggling to find common ground that also would allay Moscow's fears that the system could target Russian warheads or undermine their deterrence strategy.

U.S. officials are looking for ways to cooperate with Russia, including the possibility of combining sensors and sharing data. A Russian argument to have joint control over the missile defense system has been rebuffed by the United States.

Meanwhile, an Israeli a new defense system shot down an anti-tank missile fired by Palestinians at Israeli forces patrolling the Gaza border on Tuesday, an army statement said.
The Trophy is a shield system mounted on tanks that spots and shoots down incoming missiles.
"For the first time during operational activity, the Trophy system alerted and intercepted (a) missile," the written army statement said.

Lebanon's Hezbollah guerrillas, who held off a punishing Israeli offensive in 2006, destroyed or disabled some three dozen tanks in that war, more than 10 percent of the total deployed.
Trophy's developers Rafael announced earlier on Tuesday that the Unites States had completed a six-week test evaluation of the system.
===========================
- political study by Veronica Bicer

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Jews Watch Over the World Balance:
Israel sides with Putin on Iran

Iran builds up diplomatic strength with key Jewish intervention.



By not denying interference, Israel practically claimed involvement in the killing of the Iranian nuclear scientist, bringing grist to the mill of the Iranian officials determined to defend Iran's nuclear program.

Siding with Putin, Israel agreed on the "scientist scenario", assuming the role of moral accomplice in Russia's killing of the Iranian scientist.

Discretely backed by the Jews,
Iran now blames the killing of the Iranian scientist on American terrorism,
putting in a bad light the American efforts to discredit Iran's nuclear program
and therefore hindering the US' tenacious efforts to claim ownership in Iran.

-Veronica Bicer

RELATED ARTICLES:

Iran asks UN to condemn nuclear scientist killing

The Associated Press

Published: Thursday, Jan. 12, 2012 - 9:02 am
Last modified: 2012-01-12T17:02:12Z

UNITED NATIONS -- The Iranian government has called on the United Nations to condemn the killing of an Iranian nuclear scientist, calling it a "terrorist attack," and blaming foreign powers.

Iranian nuclear scientist Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan was killed Wednesday by a bomb attached to his car by a passing bicyclist.

In a letter to the U.N. secretary general, Iran's Ambassador Mohammad Khazaee called on the U.N. to condemn the killing and two earlier attacks as attempts to disrupt "Iran's peaceful nuclear program."

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton denied any U.S. role in the slaying. Israeli officials, in contrast, have hinted at covert campaigns against Iran without directly admitting involvement.

http://www.sacbee.com/2012/01/12/4183057/iran-asks-un-to-condemn-nuclear.html

Iranian scientist involved in nuclear program killed in Tehran bomb attack

By Thomas Erdbrink and Joby Warrick, Published: January 11

TEHRAN — A scientist linked to Iran’s nuclear program was killed in his car by a bomb-wielding assailant on Wednesday, a bold rush-hour attack that experts say points to a further escalation in a covert campaign targeting the country’s atomic officials and institutions.

The precision hit in a northern Tehran neighborhood killed the 32-year-old chemical engineer employed at Iran’s main uranium-enrichment facility and brought to four the number of Iranian scientists killed by bombs in the past two years. No one asserted responsibility for the bombing, which prompted a swirl of accusations and denials as well as renewed concerns about worsening tensions between Iran and the West.

Iranian officials immediately accused the United States and Israel of orchestrating the attack on scientist Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan, who was killed along with his bodyguard when an assailant on a motorcycle slapped a magnetic bomb on his car as he commuted to work, according to Iranian news reports. Vice President Mohammad Reza Rahimiblamed the attack on “Zionists” and “those who claim they are against terrorism,” the semiofficial Fars News Agency reported.

The Obama administration denied involvement in the attack and distanced itself from the kind of lethal tactics used to kill the scientist.

“I want to categorically deny any United States involvement in any kind of act of violence inside Iran,” Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told reporters shortly after the bombing was reported.

Israeli officials declined to address Iranian accusations linking Israeli intelligence operatives to the hit. “It is not our policy to comment on this sort of speculation when it periodically arises,” an Israeli official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity under government ground rules.

But the series of attacks against scientists — all of them employed in fields or institutions relevant to Iran’s nuclear program — underscored the perception of a sophisticated covert campaign to disrupt Iran’s nuclear efforts and intimidate key officials and scientists, according to security analysts and Iran experts. The killing bore strong resemblance to two 2010 attacks on nuclear scientists and came on the same day as a ceremony for the second anniversary of the killing of another professor, Massoud Ali Mohammadi, in an explosion.

The scientists’ deaths are part of a pattern of attacks and apparent sabotage. In recent years, Iran has experienced an increase in mysterious explosions at military and industrial sites and gas transportation lines. A computer virus called Stuxnet also has damaged the nation’s nuclear program.

“The idea clearly is to try to disrupt operations that could lead to a nuclear weapon, and to make their scientists feel less secure and less capable of doing their work,” said David Albright, a former U.N. weapons inspector and president of the Institute for Science and International Security.

Some current and former government officials worried that the tactics could backfire, bolstering Iran’s resolve to defy the West.

-The Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/iranian-scientist-killed-in-tehran-bomb-attack/2012/01/11/gIQAT1V7pP_story.html

Putin ally fears Israel is pushing US toward Iran war

Thu Jan 12, 2012 7:19am EST
-Reuters

MOSCOW, Jan 12 (Reuters) - Russia fears Israel will push the United States into a military conflict with Iran which could retaliate by blocking oil shipments from the Gulf, a confidant of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said.

"There is a likelihood of military escalation of the conflict, towards which Israel is pushing the Americans," Nikolai Patrushev, who heads the Kremlin's Security Council, told Interfax news agency.

Patrushev, a former head of the main successor to the Soviet-era KGB, said Tehran could respond by blocking the Strait of Hormuz between Oman and Iran, through which 35 percent of the world's seaborne traded oil passes.

"It cannot be ruled out that the Iranians will be able to carry out their threat to shut exports of Saudi oil through the Strait of Hormuz if faced with military actions against them," Patrushev said in an interview published on Thursday.

Tension over Iranian uranium enrichment, which has moved to a mountain bunker better protected from possible air strikes, has raised fears for world oil supplies and even of war.

Iran says its nuclear programme is peaceful while Western powers believe it has military aims. Israel, which sees an Iranian atom bomb as a threat to its existence, is willing to attack Iranian nuclear sites with or without U.S. backing.

However, Patrushev said there was still no proof that Iran was on the brink of creating nuclear weapons.

"Talk about Iran creating an atomic bomb by next week we have heard for many years," he said, adding that the United States was trying to topple the Iran's leadership using "all available means" to make the country into "a loyal partner".

Russia, the world's biggest energy producer, opposes further U.N. Security Council sanctions over Tehran's nuclear programme and has sharply criticised U.S. and European Union sanctions.

The United States has said it would use force if Iran carried out its threat to block the strait and moved a new aircraft carrier strike group to the Arabian Sea this week.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/12/russia-usa-security-idUSL6E8CC1QK20120112

Saturday, November 26, 2011

(Updated) Financial Crisis - Political Scenario



Everything is politics. Money have no value at this level.

If anybody was still skeptical, the latest Greece-Italy-Spain events come to prove that the so-called financial crisis turned out to be a US-made political scenario in order to justify the grabbing back of these three European states.

Berlusconi, definitely the greatest EU politician, who was making high class politics with both the US and Russia,
Papandreou, who has brought Greece closer to the communist values
and Zapatero, the fierce communist who, for 7 years, helped rebuilding the bridge between Russia and the Latin America,

have all been kicked out of the political stage, being replaced by the US puppets Mario Monti in Italy, Lucas Papademos in Greece and respectively Mariano Rajoy in Spain.

With the already US' puppets - Merkel in Germany and Sarkozy in France - ,
the US took over the EU.

Therefore, it is highly possible that the financial crisis that preceded the WWII was the same kind of scenario.

------------------------------------------------------

The recent selling out of North Africa and the EU is a two-sided coin.

The reverse should be a close ranks operation in the former USSR, operation which has seriously begun a couple of years ago, when the Ukraine was taken back by Russia,

and a close ranks operation in the Eastern Europe, where a potential US' missile shield, by now on paper only, but which could become reality in a few years, would put Russia in a position of check-mate, placed so close to the Russian borders.

In Poland the installation of US' missile shield was frozen and in Romania the close-ranks operation started with the ousting of Mircea Geoana, the Washington spy infiltrated amongst the Romanian Socialists.

Hopefully the leftist trend will continue in Romania, with the next year's parliamentary elections, where the USL (Social-Liberal Union) is favourite in the race.

A left-sided Romanian parliament would be an important victory for Russia, sine the parliament takes the decisions concerning the installation of the US' military base from Deveselu, scheduled to be functional in 2015.

The pariament could postpone the installation date.

Saturday, May 21, 2011

Putin doesn't focus on EU anymore - France's socialist candidate to presidency framed-up


1. Dominique Strauss-Kahn framed up = Sarkozy has no rival in the presidential race.

DSK was framed up long ago, when Sarkozy, together with his American gang, proposed him for the IMF lead.

2. Carla Bruni pregnant = Sarkozy is a family man. 
3. G8 summit next week hosted by Sarkozy = Sarkozy boosts image as an important politician.

--------------

In the light of the missile shield, Putin finally realized that the USSR is more important than the EU.

Therefore, the question is not why DSK was sacked, but rather what happened back in 2007? Why did he accept Sarkozy's proposal to head the IMF?

It's pretty clear that Russia tried to build up a communist nucleus in France, with DSK at the helm.

Whether these efforts were true intentions to take over France, or they were just meant to be used as leverage for Putin's future negotiations with the US on the missile shield.

In 2007 though, when DSK was proposed to lead the IMF, it was crystal clear that something's going on and that Russia got its position weakened in France, possibly in the aftermath of the discussions that the Russian leaders had with the American leaders on global military issues.

I don't think that DSK could be that naive not to figure out that his political career was already done in 2007, when he accepted to head the IMF.

- So either Russia suggested DSK to accept the job and ensured DSK that "they will think of something". 
DSK could live with with the hope that meanwhile something could change in the Russia-US relations and that he could, by chance, still become France's president even though he accepted the job at the IMF.

- Or DSK knew about his pure puppet role, he knew that, from the moment when he accepted to head the IMF, his chances to become the new president of France head towards 0, but continued to play the part at the pressure of both the US and Russia, which already established by negotiations the future political shape of the EU.

In any case, as the above-mentioned events unfold, Putin doesn't seem to focus on France anymore - the communist poll in Europe. And this since 2007.

In this light, I hope that Putin is wise enough not to sell Iran out, at least.

Possibly Fukushima was staged just to give the US a good reason to engulf Japan in their missile shield net. Hopefully it had nothing to do with framing up Iran's Bushehr.

It would also be good for Putin to have the power to not let Ukraine out in the EU.

RELATED ARTICLES:

IMF Chief Scandal Throws French Elections A Curveball


Iran says Bushehr nuclear power plant becomes operational

Friday, May 06, 2011

Putin moved the US' missile shield in Romania 250 miles Westwards

The location of the missile shield in Romania was moved over night from Kogalniceanu - near the Black Sea (the initial location of the US' military), to Deveselu in Oltenia region. (see maps 1, 2).

For now Romania is the only European state to host elements of the US' missile shield.
Bulgarian officials declared that it won't host NATO, US missile shield facilities.

Other elements of the US' missile shield will be placed at the South of the Mediterranean Sea, in the North African countries which recently suffered the artificial revolutions (see map 3), coordinated from Washington with Russia's approval, in the aftermath of the Russian-American negotiation process on the missile shield issue, which unfolded under the New START Treaty umbrella.

In Asia, elements of the US' missile shield will be placed in Japan (in the aftermath of Fukushima staged events) and in South Korea.

MAP 1

MAP2

MAP3

Meanwhile Russia tries to strengthen its position at the Black Sea: it signed an agreement with Ukraine for the Russian fleet to stay in the Black Sea for 25 years, it insists to put the Canadian company Sterling on the run from the Serpent Island (see map) and it gathered the Blackseafor for military exercises.

The alleged oil and gas reserves on the Serpent Island are, if real, of no interest to anybody.
The use of this island is purely military strategic.

Other important news of this week is the Brusells summit, that I will try to write about in another post.

Under this summit Russia allegedly required an accord with the US on the missile shield that the US started to build in the Eastern Europe - see Romania.

In reality they just reached a consensus earlier in Prague, by moving (for now) the base in Romania 250 miles Westwards. An accord on a military base just installed has no meanings. The alleged "accord" that Russia tries to reach now with the US is just dust in the Russian's eyes, who see the missile shield becoming a reality.

The Deveselu base, however, won't be functional until 2015.
By then, hopefully Putin will find a way to put it on the run from here.
If not, Russia will be in trouble, positioned in such disadvantageous angle.

-Veronica Bicer

===============================================

Snake Island, also known as Serpent Island, (Ukrainian: Острів Зміїний, Ostriv Zmiinyi; Romanian: Insula şerpilor), is a Ukrainian island located in the Black Sea near the Danube Delta.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_Island_(Black_Sea)

The Black Sea Naval Co-operation Task Group (BLACKSEAFOR), was created in early 2001 under the leadership of Turkey, with the participation of all other Black Sea littoral states, namely Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine, Russia and Georgia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_Naval_Co-operation_Task_Group

RELATED ARTICLES:

U.S. Assures Russia on Romania Missile Base
05 May 2011

A senior U.S. official on Wednesday urged Russia not to be alarmed by Romania's surprise announcement that it would host a U.S. missile defense site at a Soviet-built base.

The Russian Foreign Ministry sharply criticized the Romanian decision to turn Deveselu, a small town in Romania's deep south, into the core of the U.S. defense system in Europe overnight, and the Kremlin asked the United States for legal guarantees that the system would not target Russia's strategic nuclear forces.

"Moscow is monitoring the events very closely because, in our opinion, the prospective missile defense system may create risks for the Russian strategic nuclear deterrence forces in the future," the Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

But U.S. Undersecretary of State Ellen Tauscher said the U.S. system posed no threat to Russia.

"We have good relations with Russia. We have just ratified the New START treaty, we are working together on various other issues," she told Romanian lawmakers in remarks carried by news agencies. "It is a system that will defend NATO and, if Russia chooses to work with us in a cooperative manner, the system will defend Russia, too."

Tauscher is to meet with Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov on Thursday.

She and Romanian President Traian Basescu on Tuesday traveled to the abandoned Deveselu base, located some 200 kilometers southwest of Bucharest in an area known for watermelon and corn. It was built with Soviet help in 1952, when the first MiG-15s landed there.

An estimated $400 million will be invested in the base, which will become operational in 2015. An average of 200 troops will be based at the site, which can host a maximum of 500, Basescu said. The base will remain under Romanian command.

Moscow wasn't the only one caught off-guard by the base decision. Romanian government officials were apparently unaware of it, and there was not even a whisper in the Romanian media until Basescu announced it Tuesday night. Local officials weren't informed, or asked for their approval, until the night before.

A senior State Duma deputy warned that Russia would take counter measures aimed at protecting itself, although not targeted at any particular entity.

"Military specialists in the United States, NATO and Romania should be absolutely aware that any measure entails counter measures," said Konstantin Kosachyov, who heads the Duma's International Affairs Committee, RIA-Novosti reported.

Basescu insisted that the agreement had serious benefits and would give Romania "the highest security level in its history."

Basescu said the remote base was chosen because it fulfilled all of the 120 requirements needed to guarantee the full security of the system.

The Romanian site is part two of a four-part plan that U.S. President Barack Obama's administration outlined in 2009, when it shelved a plan by the previous administration to use long-range interceptors based in Poland to counter a threat from Iran and North Korea. That plan was opposed by Russia, which worried that the system could target Russian warheads or undermine the Kremlin's deterrence strategy.

The Obama administration has said its plan — designed to counter the threat of short- to medium-range missiles — would be more effective and able to counter a threat from Iran earlier. But critics have said the new plan caved in to Russian demands and have doubted whether the administration could build an effective shield in the timetable promised.

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/us-assures-russia-on-romania-missile-base/436300.html

Russian Navy will stay in Sevastopol forever - admiral

07:35 23/04/2011

Russia will never give up its naval base in Ukraine's port of Sevastopol on the Crimean peninsula, ex-commander of the Russian Black Sea Fleet Adm. Igor Kasatonov said.

Russia's Black Sea Fleet is stationed in Crimea under a lease agreement with Ukraine. On April 21, 2010, Moscow and Kiev signed a deal extending the lease on the fleet's base in Sevastopol for 25 years after the current lease expires in 2017.

"The year 2042 is not the final date of the Black Sea Fleet's presence in Crimea. The Russian Navy will stay in Sevastopol forever," Kasatonov said in a recent interview with the Kiev-based Expert magazine.

"Russia will never give up either Sevastopol or the Kuril Islands," the admiral said, adding that the naval base in Sevastopol played the utmost strategic role in the protection of Russia's southwestern border.

Kasatonov said that the Black Sea Fleet must be equipped with advanced weaponry as soon as possible to counter effectively the existing and emerging global threats.

At present, the Black Sea Fleet has about 40 operational vessels, including a single diesel-electric submarine, but most of them are slated for decommissioning.

Russian Navy Commander Admiral Vladimir Vysotsky said last year that the fleet would be reinforced with 15 new combat ships and diesel-electric submarines by 2020, and could become a formidable force by 2035.

MOSCOW, April 23 (RIA Novosti)

http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20110423/163662123.html

May 2011

Sterling threatens Black Sea operations suspension

Canadian energy firm Sterling Resources has declared force majeure on exploration in its Midia and Pelican offshore oil perimeters in the Black Sea, Romania, because of a lack of clarity among government authorities in issuing construction permits. Sterling Resources said the project had not been able to obtain permits required for offshore activities under a 2009 law. The company won the environmental and drilling rights for the areas earlier this year. “Romanian governmental authorities are currently unable or unwilling to provide construction permits for offshore oil and gas activities,” said a company release.

http://www.thediplomat.ro/articol.php?id=1959

Blackseafor drill over

Several ships of the Russian Black Sea Fleet operating as part of the Blackseafor naval cooperation task force left the port of Novorossiysk on Tuesday at the close of a joint exercise, the Fleet’s representative said after the results of the drill had been summed up on board Blackseafor's Romanian flagship.

Blackseafor was established in 2001 in Istanbul in line with the pertinent accord signed by Russia, Turkey, Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine and Georgia.

http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/04/26/49477109.html

Bulgaria Won't Host US, NATO Missile Shield Facilities - Defense Min
Defense | May 5, 2011, Thursday

Bulgaria will not be hosting elements of the US and NATO missile defense system in Europe, at least for the time being, Defense Minister Anyu Angelov announced.

"The only certain Bulgarian participation in the creation of the NATO missile shield in Europe is our proportional share in its funding. No specific talks have been held for anything more than that even though Bulgaria has declared its readiness," Gen. Angelov said.

His comment comes shortly after the United States and Romania jointly selected the Deveselu Air Base near Caracal, Romania, to host a US Ballistic Missile Defense System, according to an official announcement of the US State Department.

The announcement, published Tuesday, informs that the System employs the SM-3 interceptor (also referred to as the "Aegis Ashore System") while the deployment to Romania is anticipated to occur in the 2015 timeframe as part of the second phase of the European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) – the US national contribution to a NATO missile defense architecture.

The announcement for the stationing of the US interceptor missiles in Southern Romania as part of the NATO/US missile defense system in Europe was expected. The bigger question was what location will be selected for the radar that is supposed to detect missiles fired at European territory.

Bulgaria and Turkey have been mentioned as the most likely locations of the radar; while officials and media reports mentioned Bulgaria more often in the spring of 2010, Turkey started to figure more prominently in the second half of last year.

The original missile defense in Europe plan of George W. Bush administration provided for stationing interceptors in Poland and the radar station in the Czech Republic. The modification of the plan by the Obama Administration switched it to sea-borne missiles and, later on, locations in southeastern Europe. Initially, there were reports and expectations that Romania and Bulgaria will replace Poland and the Czech Republic, respectively.

During its summit in November 2010 in Lisbon, NATO agreed to adopt the previously purely US missile shield project as its own. The summit did cast some serious doubts over Turkey's participation in the missile defense system because it insisted that its Muslim neighbor Iran should not be mentioned as a source of threat in the respective documents, and eventually prevailed.

The newly announced US Ballistic Missile Defense site in Romania is approximately 430 acres (175 hectares) and is located within the existing Romanian Air Base at Deveselu.

Deveselu is about 50 kilometers away from the Romanian-Bulgarian border. The closest Bulgarian location is the village of Zagrazhden between the towns of Oryahovo and Nikopol.

According to the US State Department, an estimated 200 military, government civilians, and support contractors will be required to operate the US facility at the site, but Romanian President, Traian Basescu, in his own TV announcement, said the number could reach 500.

"The Ballistic Missile Defense System is not aimed at Russia," Basescu stressed.

A year ago, US Undersecretary of State Ellen Tauscher, declared that the United States has not asked Bulgaria to locate elements of the missile defense in Europe on its territory.

Bulgarian President, Georgi Parvanov, recently stated the country must become part of NATO missile defense, but the public will have to be informed with precision and detail. In a rare move, Defense Minister, Anyu Angelov, joined the President in this opinion.

The EPAA will provide protection of NATO European territories and populations, and augment protection of the United States, against the increasing threats posed by the proliferation of ballistic missiles from the Middle East, the US State Department points out.

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=127963

Missile shield raises new nuclear arms race fears
March 2010

Over the next 18 months the USA and Romania will finalise the location. The US military currently operates from the Mihail Kogalniceanu air base in Constanta county near the Black Sea. This is a remote place as geographically close to the potential threat as possible for Romania, and locations around or close to the base could be an option. Stratfor’s military analyst Nathan Hughes says it is “flexible” where in Romania the defence system could be but, because this is a new initiative, it is hard to be certain of locations.

http://www.thediplomat.ro/articol.php?id=905

Saturday, 3 April 2010 07:16 UK
Romania defends role in US missile shield

No sites have yet been decided, but two almost certainly under consideration are the Mihail Kogalniceanu airbase near the Black Sea coast, and a military airfield near Cluj in Transylvania.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8587946.stm

HOME PAGE
MOST IMPORTANT ARTICLES AND DOCUMENTS

Why has the US put an end to the Bin Laden fairytale?

I don't figure out yet the exact reason why the US put an end to the the Bin Laden fairytale.
By now I figured two possible reasons:


1. Because this year there is the 10 years commemoration of the deaths in the twin towers (September 2001- September 2011)

Bush was an impotent. All right. But how could Obama present himself as an impotent too, on 11-th of September 2011? This would've meant that the common American can't trust anybody in the political class anymore.

Therefore something had to be done for the common American elector to be have confidence again in the American political class. Bin Laden fairytale had to come to an end.

Obama announced the end of the fairytale, the imaginary body vanished into the sea, this meaning not another trouble, not another CIA people paid for another adobe photoshop-made footage. A word from the afro-American puppet president was enough.

The summer vacation is near and so Bin Laden had to disappear. No problem, the so-called "terrorism" isn't over. Nothing changed on the matter.

The CIA can well continue to blow up buildings and subways and to blame it on Al-Zawahiri, the new invented Yemen Al-Awlaki, or on another "terrorist" cartoon, made in photoshop adobe.

-------------

2. Another possible scenario is that the US wants to justify the invasion of Libya.

Gaddafi said in February 2011 that he blames bin Laden, drugs for Libya unrest.

See video:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41753687/ns/world_news-mideast/n_africa/t/gadhafi-blames-bin-laden-drugs-libya-unrest/

Now Gaddafi has no one to blame anymore and so the Libyan uprisings allegedly prove being "spontaneously" pointed against Gaddafi.

Libya rebels: Gaddafi should face bin Laden's fate


http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=218808&R=R3

Osama bin Laden killing 'should serve as warning to Gaddafi' says head of Armed Forces


The killing of Osama bin Laden should serve as a warning to Libya's Muammar al Gaddafi, the head of the Armed Forces has said.


Gen Sir David Richards, the Chief of the Defence Staff, said the death of the al-Qaeda leader should have a "psychological impact" on the Libyan dictator and others because "one day their deeds will catch up with them".


The general's warning came as British officials disclosed that weeks of allied attacks had cost Col Gaddafi almost three quarters of his military forces.


Sir David described the killing of bin Laden as "definitely a positive" in the context of political change in the Middle East.


"It will remind like-minded people wherever they are that one day their deeds will catch up with them," he said.


"That is psychologically very important in the context of Libya and other crises in the Middle East, so I think it is a psychological impact rather than a short-term impact."


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8499221/Osama-bin-Laden-killing-should-serve-as-warning-to-Gaddafi-says-head-of-Armed-Forces.html

But in my opinion Gaddafi is small fry.

Bin Laden fairytale is just too big bullet to be wasted on Gaddafi.

The first version of the scenario is therefore more plausible: 10 years since September 2001 and a president change. Time for Bin Laden fairytale to disappear before Americans remember the deads and flood the streets again.

Corroborated with the fact that for the US is very important to place that missile shield anywhere, just to place it once and for all (it moved it from Poland and now it plans to place it at the South of the Mediterranean, in the chain of countries where there was the outburts of "spontaneous" revolutions, including Libya), the end of the Bin Laden fairytale isn't that surprising anymore.

In this context, perhaps the time has come for the Bin Laden fairytale to be sacrificed.

See map:


- Veronica Bicer

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Discussion for the US' Ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, under New START


The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) bans all nuclear explosions in all environments, for military or civilian purposes. It has not entered into force. (WIKIPEDIA) because the US has not ratified it yet.

The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (Annex 1,2) was signed by both US and the Soviet Union on
September 24, 1996, but it was ratified only by Russia, on June 30, 2000.
List of parties to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty

Instead, the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (PTBT) is into force. PTBT prohibitis all test detonations of nuclear weapons except underground and was signed and ratified by both Russia and the US in 1963.

Under New START, Russia insists for the US' ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.

-Veronica Bicer

ARTICLES ON THE TOPIC:

The Prague Agenda: The New START's Next Steps

Washington - The New START treaty not only represents a commitment by the United States and Russia toward nuclear disarmament, but also strengthens the reset between Washington and Moscow "that is helping us to address the most urgent proliferation threats we face in Iran and North Korea," National Security Advisor Thomas Donilon says.

(Media-Newswire.com) - Washington — The New START treaty not only represents a commitment by the United States and Russia toward nuclear disarmament, but also strengthens the reset between Washington and Moscow “that is helping us to address the most urgent proliferation threats we face in Iran and North Korea,” National Security Advisor Thomas Donilon says.

The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty ( START ), signed April 8, 2010, by President Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, marks the first major arms reduction pact since the last days of the Cold War.

Keynoting the Carnegie International Nuclear Policy Conference meeting in Washington on March 29, Donilon outlined the next steps to establish missile-defense cooperation.

Referencing President Obama’s vision for achieving the “peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons” in a speech the president delivered in Prague in 2009, Donilon presented the Obama administration’s plans to advance each of the four dimensions of the president’s agenda.

To reduce the number and role of nuclear weapons, the United States recently exchanged data with Russia on nuclear facilities under the auspices of the Bilateral Consultative Commission, the treaty’s implementing body, currently meeting in Geneva. On-site inspections conducted under the treaty will soon follow. Once the treaty is fully implemented, Donilon said, it will mark the lowest number of deployed nuclear warheads since the 1950s, the first full decade of the nuclear age.

The administration’s next agreement with Russia should include nondeployed and nonstrategic nuclear weapons, Donilon said. “A priority will be to address tactical nuclear weapons.” No previous arms control agreement has included such provisions.

“We are ready to begin discussions soon with Russia on transparency and confidence-building measures that could provide the basis for creative verification measures in the next round of U.S.-Russia nuclear arms reductions,” Donilon said.

To ensure a safe, secure and effective nuclear arsenal that will facilitate arms reductions, the Obama administration intends to invest $85 billion in the nation’s nuclear infrastructure over the next 10 years, Donilon said. “If Congress approves the president’s funding program for the nuclear complex, it allows us to reduce the size of our nuclear stockpile because we will be able to maintain a robust hedge against technical problems with a much smaller reserve force,” Donilon said, adding that the arsenal is “necessary to defend the U.S. and our allies and partners for as long as nuclear weapons exist.”

Paralleling the Russia discussions, President Obama is committed to deploying an effective missile-defense system to defend the United States and its allies against threats from such countries as Iran and North Korea, Donilon said. He cited the Phased Adaptive Approach, which provides a more effective and timely response to missile threats, an approach embraced by NATO at the Lisbon summit in November 2010, and widely regarded as a substantial improvement over the prior program, according to Donilon.

To advance the second element of the president’s Prague agenda — nonproliferation — the administration is working with the International Atomic Energy Agency to ensure inspections and verifications, while tightening international sanctions against Iran and North Korea.

The administration is committed to working with both political parties in the Senate to ratify the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty ( CTBT ). Ratification would serve America’s national security interests by strengthening the legal and political barriers to a resumption of nuclear testing, “which would fuel the nuclear buildup in Asia,” Donilon said.

Donilon also cited President Obama’s support for a new international treaty, the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty ( FMCT ), designed to verifiably end the production of fissile material for use in nuclear weapons.

To meet the third element of the Prague agenda, preventing nuclear terrorism by strengthening international cooperation on nuclear security, the administration has set a global work plan to secure all vulnerable nuclear materials within four years. An interim goal is to demonstrate significant progress by the next Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul, South Korea, in 2012.

The fourth element of President Obama’s Prague agenda is to develop new mechanisms to support the growth of safe and secure nuclear power in ways that reduce the spread of dangerous technologies. Citing the lessons learned from the Fukushima accident in Japan, Donilon called for all nations with nuclear energy programs to ensure the safe operation of nuclear power plants and safe storage of nuclear waste.

The administration is working with the international community to meet the increased demand for low-carbon sources of electricity and access peaceful nuclear power without increasing the risks of proliferation, Donilon said.

( This is a product of the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://www.america.gov )

http://media-newswire.com/release_1147398.html

Physics professor talks about nuclear weapons

By Molly Gentzel
Collegian Staff

Physics professor Dr. Jerry Gilfoyle discussed the importance of being educated about nuclear weapons and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty to a group of students and faculty in his lecture on Wednesday.
Approximately 25 students and faculty members came to hear Gilfoyle’s lecture, “Putting the Genie Back in the Bottle: The Science of Nuclear Non-Proliferation.” Gilfoyle explained the significance of the nuclear bomb and why college students and citizens of the United States should be concerned with this issue.

Gilfoyle said his interest in nuclear weapons had gone back a long time, and he had spent 2001 working with the federal government in Washington, D.C.

There, Gilfoyle did an assessment of the test-ban treaty and submitted it to President Bill Clinton. An article explaining Gilfoyle’s study of the test-ban treaty and his request for the U.S. to ratify it was on the cover of The New York Times, Gilfoyle said.

“The goal of the test-ban treaty is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, material and technology and to reduce or eliminate nuclear weapons,” he said.

The treaty is not based on trust, but rather on a network of testers that are designed to detect signs of nuclear explosions, Gilfoyle said.
The U.S is currently a signatory of the treaty, but it has not ratified it. Gilfoyle said President Obama is committed to bringing the CTBT to a vote for ratification in the senate.

“You should care [about nuclear weapons and the test-ban treaty] if you’re going to be a good citizen and vote,” Gilfoyle said.

Gilfoyle said that ratification of the test-ban treaty would diffuse a lot of potential arms races, and because of advanced technology, it was apparent that detection and identification of nuclear explosions is possible.

“There is important, exciting physics to be done here,” Gilfoyle said. “As someone who has studied this for years, my belief is that we should ratify the treaty.”

Contact staff writer Molly Gentzel at molly.gentzel@richmond.edu

http://thecollegianur.com/2011/04/14/physics-professor-talks-about-nuclear-weapons/20243/

Japan crisis renews interest in U.S. anti-nuke movement
Friday, 04.15.11

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/04/14/2168421_p2/japan-crisis-renews-interest-in.html

HOME PAGE
MOST IMPORTANT ARTICLES AND DOCUMENTS

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Clinton February 18, 2009, Clinton 17 April 2011 - Japan Connection

And here is why Japan, and not another country, has been blown up: You don't want our troops there? We will make you swallow them!

February 18, 2009 - Clinton, Japan sign US troops pull-out deal 
April 17, 2011 - Clinton Announces Partnership to Help Japan












(UPDATE): The US staged Fukushima in order to tame down the Japanese and to place elements of the missile shield there.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Clinton, Japan sign US troops pull-out deal February 18, 2009

TOKYO: The US will move 8000 troops from Okinawa, in southern Japan, to its territory of Guam by 2014 under an agreement signed by the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, in Tokyo yesterday.

Japan will contribute more than $US6 billion ($9.24 billion) towards the planned relocation of the US Marines, first agreed between Washington and Tokyo in May 2006. Mrs Clinton and Japan's Foreign Minister, Hirofumi Nakasone, signed the agreement, in which Japan pledges to pay up to $US2.8 billion in cash and $US3.29 billion in loans and other investments for the relocation cost. Putting her signature on the agreement was the first substantive act of Mrs Clinton's Asia tour in Japan. Following the ceremony, she renewed a US offer for normal ties and a peace treaty with North Korea if it verifiably and completely eliminates its nuclear weapons program. Under a deal in 2007 with the US, China, South Korea, Japan and Russia, North Korea agreed to end its weapons-grade nuclear program in exchange for energy aid. But progress in the talks stalled late last year when North Korea, which tested an atomic bomb in 2006, baulked at demands for inspections and other steps to verify disarmament. "If North Korea abides by the obligations it has already entered into and verifiably and completely eliminates its nuclear program, then there will be a reciprocal response," Mrs Clinton said. As laid out in the six-nation deal, the US would offer "a chance to normalise relations", she said, as well as a full peace treaty with the North. The 1950-1953 Korean conflict ended only with an armistice. Mrs Clinton also warned against any missile launch by Pyongyang. Such an action "would be very unhelpful in moving our relationship forward", she said. The isolated Stalinist country on Monday fuelled speculation that it is preparing to test a long-range missile. Mrs Clinton said she would press Pyongyang to account for the fate of Japanese citizens kidnapped to train North Korean spies in language skills. She was scheduled to meet with their families late yesterday. Speaking at a joint press conference, Mr Nakasone said Japan believed the new US administration of President Barack Obama would not change its North Korea policy "in any serious way". Okinawans have long been reluctant hosts for more than half of the 40,000 US troops based in Japan. The pullout aims to reduce the burden of the post-World War II American military presence in Okinawa, where residents have long complained of noise from military operations and occasional crimes by US servicemen. Agence France-Presse

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/world/clinton-japan-sign-us-troops-pullout-deal/2009/02/17/1234632811274.html

Clinton to visit Japan in show of support (AFP) – 2 days ago

WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will visit Japan in a show of support for the US ally as it recovers from a devastating earthquake, the State Department announced Monday. Clinton will travel to Tokyo on Sunday, after stops in South Korea and in Germany where she is attending a NATO conference, State Department spokesman Mark Toner said. Clinton's trip aims to "show the United States' support for the people of Japan and to highlight our long-standing commitment to the alliance," Toner said in a statement. She will hold talks with Prime Minister Naoto Kan and other senior Japanese officials, Toner said. The announcement comes on the one-month anniversary of Japan's worst disaster since World War II, which killed at least 13,000 people and left another 14,000 missing in a massive earthquake and debris-laden tsunami.

The United States, whose military presence in Japan has sometimes been controversial, deployed some 15,000 troops to assist in relief.

Senior US officials were also expected to participate in a memorial service later Monday at the Washington National Cathedral. Clinton will take part in a NATO conference on Thursday and Friday in Berlin, where she will hold talks on alliance-backed military operations in Libya and Afghanistan, the State Department said. She will head Saturday to South Korea for talks with President Lee Myung-Bak "as part of our ongoing efforts to strengthen the alliance and to discuss cooperation on regional issues," Toner said. Copyright © 2011 AFP. All rights reserved

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hE9MrO-Mhj6obwd-DYS-87IgWBZw?docId=CNG.740d17ecc56dea7e86ae6c9aaa0aed5e.681

JAPAN NEWS APRIL 17, 2011, 8:45 A.M. ET

Clinton Announces Partnership to Help Japan

By CHESTER DAWSON And EVAN RAMSTAD

TOKYO—U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with senior Japanese leaders on Sunday to express sympathy with Japan's people and support for its economy after last month's devastating earthquake and tsunami. That came after she reiterated the Obama administration's support for a free-trade deal with South Korea in meetings earlier Sunday with senior officials in Seoul.

On the second stop of a weekend trip to Asia, Ms. Clinton announced in Tokyo a public-private partnership to help Japan's economic prospects and sounded a note of optimism about the Japanese business community's ability to rebound in the wake of the 9.0-magnitude quake on March 11. The disaster has seriously disrupted supply chains and electricity supplies in Japan and threatens to knock the wind out of a budding economic recovery.

"We are very confident that Japan will recover and that it will be a very strong economic and global player for years and decades to come," Ms. Clinton told Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan after arriving from Seoul earlier in the day.

For his part, the Japanese leader voiced a "sincere appreciation" for U.S. military efforts to provide aid to disaster evacuees and also for advice from U.S. nuclear experts sent to Japan.

Five weeks after the quake, Tokyo has struggled to contain radiation being emitted from a nuclear power plant that was damaged by tsunami waves. Separately on Sunday, the plant's operator, Tokyo Electric Power, said it expects to stabilize the reactors at its Fukushima Daiichi facility within six to nine months.

Mr. Kan also said he was encouraged by Washington's decision on Friday to end travel advisories which had cautioned Americans to avoid Japan in the wake of the nuclear crisis. The U.S. kept a ban on travel within 50 miles of the plant, but lifted a general advisory about travel to Japan. R-Righht.

Japanese Foreign Minister Matsumoto thanked Ms. Clinton for the U.S. military's disaster relief and recovery efforts. "We would like to express gratitude for working with us around the clock since the earthquake," he said. Mr. Matsumoto added Japan would strive to provide full and transparent disclosure at home and abroad about the ongoing crisis at the Fukushima nuclear plant.

During an overnight trip to Seoul, Ms. Clinton met with South Korean President Lee Myung-bak and Foreign Minister Kim Sung-hwan, emphasizing economic connections rather than security ties. That appeared to signal the two countries are for the moment content with their relative strategies vis-à-vis North Korea.

The Secretary of State told her Korean hosts that the Obama administration is committed to pressing Congress to ratify the U.S.-South Korea free-trade agreement this year."It is important that we're meeting in the home stretch of the Korean free trade agreement," Ms. Clinton said.

Her push is part of a bigger campaign by the administration on the deal, which is under pressure partly because South Korea is close to ratification of a similar free-trade pact with the European Union.

Later this month, U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke will lead a bipartisan congressional delegation on a trip to South Korea to promote the deal, which is expected to boost the $80 billion two-way trade relationship by 10% to 20% over a five-year period.

Ms. Clinton also spoke to Messrs. Lee and Kim about coordinating North Korea policy. Both countries have been under some pressure from humanitarian activists to restart food aid to the North, where food shortages are expected to be greater than usual in May and June.

But leaders in neither country are under political pressure to change course on North Korea strategy, due to the North's belligerence as well as the greater importance of other events in the world, such as the unrest in the Middle East and disaster recovery in Japan.

North Korea twice last year attacked South Korea's military, both times scuttling quiet diplomacy that had been taking place between Seoul and Pyongyang. South Korean diplomats were hoping to reduce the North's anger at being cut off from unfettered economic aid in 2008 and prod its authoritarian regime into substantive talks about development and disarmament.

North Korea in 2009 walked away from the six-party talks between it and five other countries—China, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the U.S.—that were aimed at persuading it to end its pursuit of nuclear weapons in exchange for economic incentives and security guarantees.

In recent months, prodded by its ally China, North Korea has signaled a willingness to return to the six-party process. But South Korea, the U.S. and Japan have insisted that Pyongyang first deal with Seoul directly over its military attacks that killed 50 South Koreans last year.

In addition, North Korea's revelation in November that it had significantly advanced a second method of building nuclear weapons, using enriched uranium, complicated the prospects for the six-party talks because it will be more difficult for the five countries to create a verifiable way to control that effort.

Another wrinkle emerged last week when the U.S. and North Korea revealed Pyongyang had been detaining an American citizen who visited the country in November for an unspecified crime. Pyongyang in the past two years made a public show of the arrests of four other Americans who entered the country illegally, forcing the U.S. to twice send former presidents in exchange for their release.

Write to Evan Ramstad at evan.ramstad@wsj.com

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704613504576268431769391772.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

(UPDATE) Japan, US discuss North Korea strategy, missile shield (Roundup)
Jan 13, 2011, 7:10 GMT

Tokyo - US Defence Secretary Robert Gates and his Japanese counterpart Toshimi Kitazawa Thursday discussed a joint North Korea strategy amid growing US concern over Pyongyang's development of inter-continental ballistic missiles.

They agreed to keep cooperating in dealing with North Korea, whose fatal artillery shelling of South Korea's Yeonpyeong island in November heightened tensions on the Korean Peninsula.

During his stay in Beijing Tuesday, Gates said North Korea's missile arsenal could present a direct threat to the United States within five years.

Gates and Kitazawa discussed the possible provision to third countries of a jointly developed sea-based missile shield system.

A bilateral accord bars the export of the Standard Missile-3 interception system to third countries unless Japan consents to it in advance.

Kitazawa told Gates that Japan would need to discuss the matter.

'I told (Gates) that we would make a decision within this year,' he said.

Gates acknowledged that Japan would need to undergo the process to make such exports possible. 'It makes economic sense to make it available to others,' he said.

Also on the agenda was a controversial US Marine base on the Japanese island of Okinawa, 1,600 kilometres south-west of Tokyo. The defence secretaries reaffirmed an accord reached in May to move the US Marine Corps' Futenma Air Station to a sparsely populated area on Okinawa.

While Tokyo reiterates it would stick with the accord, there has been virtually no progress due to vehement opposition from locals and environmental groups.

Gates said the United States still hoped to carry out the relocation according to the plan.

'We hope to move forward with the relocation of US forces in Okinawa in ways that are more appropriate to our strategic posture while reducing the impact on the communities nearby,' he said.

The US and Japan were considering moving drills involving F-15 fighters from the island to Guam, Kitazawa said.

Gates also met with Foreign Minister Seiji Maehara and the two agreed to work toward deepening the US-Japan security alliance, which marked its 50th anniversary in 2010.

Gates said he looked forward to 'taking stock' of the alliance with Japanese ministers 'in terms of where we are and the next steps we will take.'

Maehara and Gates shared the view that the US military presence in the Asia-Pacific region had become increasingly important given the difficult security situation in the area, an unnamed Japanese official was quoted by Kyodo News as saying.

Gates expressed concerns over North Korea's nuclear and missile programmes. The two urged Pyongyang to take concrete denuclearization steps and expected China to play an enhanced role in resolving the nuclear standoff, the official said.

Prime Minister Naoto Kan told Gates that many incidents had taken place in Asia, and he appreciated Washington's support.

He appeared to refer to a Chinese fishing boat's collision with Japanese coastguard vessels near a disputed set of islets in the East Asia Sea and the subsequent arrest of the captain, which led to the worst diplomatic row in recent years between Tokyo and Beijing.

Gates arrived in Tokyo on Wednesday after visiting Beijing and is to fly to Seoul on Friday to conclude his East Asia trip.

http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/asiapacific/news/article_1611409.php/Japan-US-discuss-North-Korea-strategy-missile-shield-Roundup

HOME PAGE
MOST IMPORTANT ARTICLES AND DOCUMENTS